Xeon Nehalem benchies

[Jcschild]

finally

c4 32 bit 4.52
Vista 64 biz SP1
12 gig ram
2x 5550 2.66mhz HT on


rme raydat PCI-e drv 3.077 (and UADs installed)

this is the blowfelds C4 test not the universal with

512 -248

256- 237

128 - 227

64 - 180

32 - 147

compared to single i7 940 (2.66GHz) HT enabled (fireface 800)

512 - 148
256 - 139
128 - 132
64 - 128
32 - 105

will try to get the newer test.

Scott
ADK

[Andrew J]

Thanks Scott. How much of the difference can you attribute to RayDat PCI-E vs FF800?

[TAFKAT]

Thanks Mate..

I'll have a dig thru these numbers a little later...

Quick edit : Good point made by Andrew, missed that on the first browse.

Once you run up DAWbench DSP Universal on the RYADAT, we will get a better idea, as I have the i7 / RME numbers there.

[Jcschild]

Thanks Scott. How much of the difference can you attribute to RayDat PCI-E vs FF800?

very little based on past experiance.

[ROCKINROG]

Have either of you tried any tests with Windows 7? I haven't got around to testing the betas with anything yet. I only checked it out on one of my main computers just to see what's different then re-imaged back. I did notice it was a bit of a resource hog (over 500Mb) and alot of services and name changes of things that confused the hell outta me. Hopefully I'll get around to checking it out further.

[Jcschild]

just for gigles

HT OFF.....

c4 32 bit 4.52
Vista 64
12 gig ram
x 5550 2.66mhz


rme raydat PCI-e drv 3.077


512 -206

256- 208

128 - 190

64 - 156

32 - 134

[Jcschild]

Vin,
please update your graph and send me the file so i can post (with your permission of course on my site as well)
rather than me use all the data i compiled using the old test...


c4 32 bit 4.52
Vista 64
12 gig ram
x 5550 2.66mhz
DSP universal this time

rme raydat drv 3.077


HT on

512 - 265

256- 248

128 - 231

64 - 214

32 - 172



HT Off

512 - 211

256- 197

128 - 190

64 - 171

32 - 147

[TAFKAT]

Hey Scott,

Awesome, thanks for that.. :-)

I'll update the graph and send you a copy, no problem.. :-)

Just make a note that all of the other results are on XP , but no matter, still shows a significant improvement in scaling over the last gen.

For a bit of fun, if you have a 2.66GHZ - Nehalem MacPro to run some number against, that would be interesting..

[Jcschild]

did you want that with XP bootcamp or OSX?

[TAFKAT]

Hey Scott,

Heres the updated graph.., I have sent you the Excel file with the raw data so you can knock up your own in a different format if you prefer..



Wow its a pity Cubendo "officially" doesn't work on Dual Quad or with Hyperthreading , otherwise these numbers would be something to be singing about, we can only hope that Steini can resolve what ever problem they are still " looking into ".....